Home > iphone, tech bits > Droid *almost* does…

Droid *almost* does…

November 27th, 2009

About a month ago I got so fed up with AT&T’s crap network I decided to try a Verizon/Motorola Droid for 30 days. I knew it wouldn’t deliver the same experience as an iPhone, but I had never used Andriod or been on the Verizon network, and quite frankly poking yourself in the eye with a hot knife is more fun than using the AT&T network, so I was very curious.

I’ll skip all of the standard unboxing, first impressions stuff that’s been well covered by my friends at Engadget and the like. I’ll even save you the drama of reading this whole post if you just want the summary.

Bottom Line: Droid is an interesting, powerful smartphone that is probably the most powerful option on Verizon, but the hardware, software, and overall user experience is no where close to an iPhone. After 30 days of playing with it, my Droid is going back and I’m going to continue suffering like a dog on AT&T for the duration. I’m a “Mac” and the differences in the software UX between Android and iPhone OS are too significant for me to live with for the next 2 years.

I spent the last 30 days with my iPhone number forwarded to the Droid so I could make and receive calls like normal. I was on the road in several locations, and tried to use every ounce of its functionality during the time I had. I’m going to discuss the hardware and software separately because, well, I think there are probably other Android 2.0 phones that are better form-factors than the Droid.

Hardware: There are both serious pros and cons to this hardware platform, but in the end Motorola rushed this device to market, and it lacks refinement. Most notably, many of the things that are supposed to be advantages of the HW platform really work against the phone.

Camera: Its great that it has a 5mp camera with a flash, but the camera’s stills aren’t much better than my iPhone (not an “S”), and night time shots with the flash suck and are generally discolored. I found that the camera trigger button on the outside of the case was actually a problem because as you fumble to get the shot lined up if you move your hand it takes the picture. The camera is slow to save the image to memory (yeah, I can go get a fast card to speed that up, right?) so you mis-fire, then wait forever while your friends get annoyed. The flash was a tease, because I got all excited I could take night pix now, but really none of them were usable or facebook-worthy.

Battery: It has a removable battery, yay, right? The battery-cover plate actually slid of more than once in my trial. Once in the car while the Droid was on the center island in the car. I hit the brakes and the phone slid but the back-side battery cover stayed put. Another few times retrieving the phone from my pocket. As far as battery-life, about the same as an iPhone. Play with it all day and its dead before you know it. Leave it alone and its a champ. Ever since getting a Mophie JuicePack, the iPhone battery issue isn’t a show-stopper. I guess I could buy an extra battery for the Droid or use an external charging device, but that kills portability.

Audio: There was something very different about the Droid’s phone-call audio. I think the difference is that the iPhone does NOT loop the mic back thru the speaker, but the Droid does. I was hearing myself talk, and it was loud so it took some getting used to. Then I’d turn the speaker down but couldn’t hear the other party as well. Being on the BT headset got rid of this issue, so I am assuming its as I suspect but I was not a fan. Voice quality was generally excellent and even when the signal got choppy I could still make out what they were saying. Very different call-handling behavior on the Verizon network for “lost packets”.

Physical device: The Droid seems to have something in common with its Star-Wars ancestors. Its functional but rough around the edges. Having a real keyboard was supposed to be a nice addition, but Motorola make a huge mistake by not making the keyboard have separate, raised buttons like a Blackberry or even the Palm Pre. The buttons are hard to use and I could never get used to it. I gave up using the physical keyboard after a week. Its got a thumb -pad that I thought would be like a trackpad but its not. Android 2.0 supports multi-touch gestures, but this phone doesn’t. Double tap to zoom, etc. I bought a case for it, but that made the phone way to bulky for the pocket, and its a 2-piece cover to handle the sliding front. No one but Motorola makes covers yet it seemed from what I could tell. Too new? I also scratched the metal case surrounding the glass on the 2nd day I had it. Having painted aluminum that is not covered by the plastic screen protector means the front end is going to get pretty dinged up. Its heavier than the iPhone, something you notice but do get used to.

The virtual keyboard posed an additional learning curve. The screen is taller than the iPhone but a tad narrower, and thus the keys are closer together just enough to require some re-learning. Typing was slower and I made more mistakes. The auto-correct is more aggressive and I spent more time backing up and retyping.

The Droid has a nice fast processor, and jumping between apps and functions is almost instant. There is no lag like there is with the iPhone. I know the 3GS is faster than my 3G, and the # of apps probably has something to do with it but I could definitely tell a difference in speed of the device. I might end up buying a 3GS so I get the faster CPU and Video support as a result of all of this testing.

Software: This is the #1 reason the iPhone wins, and will continue to dominate the smartphone market for years to come. It’s all about the software. Ease-of-use, intuitiveness, less-is-more, etc. Oh, and the Apps. The apps ARE better, there are more of them. There is a certain reality to the apps now. App developers can make more money by focusing on the iPhone apps, and it shows. The Android apps seem comparatively thin and incomplete. Many Android apps are on their first generation, where iPhone apps have been getting refined for a few years now.

Android 2.0: The background -app support is huge. This does give the device a great advantage. Its most notable when you are in the middle of a drive and using the turn-by-turn Google navigation (works GREAT, audio voice is awkward and can’t be changed AFAIK) and you need to do something else and come back to the nav. The notification service is also nice and you have a quick way to jump into various services/apps that have new messages/events for you. Overall the OS and the apps feel very “beta” across the board. I often had apps crash, or the OS tell me the app was running slow and was suspended, etc. The apps lack polish in general and are not nearly as intuitive as iPhone apps. I found myself spending way more time going in circles looking for features that weren’t there or hoping to be able to change behavior to be more natural. I’m not going to review app-by-app, I’d be here for a week. One thing that really highlighted some of the challenges that come with an “open” platform is the fact that Visual Voicemail is a separate app from the Phone functionality. Its odd that way. Also, the VV won’t work with bluetooth headsets. Went into the Verizon store and everyone in there looked at me like I was speaking french and talking about my poodle. On the flip side, Andriod 2.0 has nice social network & content sharing integrations built-in. When you are taking pictures/video, sharing content, etc you get a pop-up to post the item to any of the installed 3rd party social networks.

Syncing: As long as you just have one Gmail account, and do everything in Google-land, you would be pretty happy. Mail/Calendar/Address sync is super easy on Andriod 2.0. Just add your account as a sync-service and bam, its all there. But if you have regular email and Gmail, you now have to open two apps. Same thing with corporate/Exchange calendars and google calendars, etc. However, what really killed my buzz with the Droid was the fact I had to USB-mount the SD card manually and drag files onto it to get music or images on the device. Not only is it more work, but then you have the added complexity of handpicking your data out of iTunes or iPhoto and moving it over, etc. The good news is that when you connect the device to a Mac, it thinks its a camera and helps you import pictures. One of the greatest things about the iPhone is the iTunes store, the super-easy syncing, and the ability to purchase content on either the mobile or the laptop and get it back and forth w/o really doing anything more than plugging the device in. I just couldn’t see myself downgrading to this manual file/folder compare process and realized I’d probably end up with the same songs and pictures on the phone for long periods of time. Also, I cannot properly sync my work calendars with the Droid through google because we don’t use google’s hosted mail service.

Verizon: Its true, Verizon seems way better of a network than AT&T. Apparently my house is a cell-coverage vortex, and even Verizon/Droid would have swings in coverage. The difference? Droid would get a tiny bit choppy for a few seconds, but hold the call. AT&T/iPhone would drop the call within a minute or two, even when it showed 5 bars. One good thing I’ve learned is that my house is a tough spot, but my wife’s on T-Mobile (jailbroken 1st G iPhone) that works GREAT at our house. Hmm. I was in the bay area for a week and managed to hold calls up and down 101 and 280 w/o dropping on the Droid. Only dropped one call while coming up Sand Hill Road at 280.

Google Navigation: Google has done a great job with this first pass at real turn-by-turn navigation. It works, its fast, and the automatic street-view when you arrive at the destination is very cool (and useful!). Google did a good job taking advantage of their strengths here. But…A few downsides hamper what would be the killer app of the Driod. One biggie is that Nav cannot start if you are on a call, because either Motorola, Droid, or Verizon don’t allow voice and data at the same time. This is pretty weak sauce, I thought the whole point of 3G was exactly this? I had to drop my call, get nav started, and call the person back. Things like route-recalualtion and street view pop-up won’t work if you are on a call. The other thing is the fidelity and quality of the voice commands are pretty bad, its sounds more like Mrs. Steven Hawking rather than Ms. Moneypenny. I kept looking for a way to upload some better voice but didn’t seen anything online about that. Still, its FREE with the Droid and the Nav platforms on the iPhone are going to be $100. Given that the Droid is only $120 now, its pretty compelling, Hawking-esque voice and all.

So, in the end the Droid goes back on Monday and I’ll likely pick up a 3GS to address the speed and lack of video support that are actual issues for me since I like to be able to grab pics and video of the kids in a flash. I may end up also trying a signal booster at the house to try to stabilize the AT&T signal. It wavers from 3G 5 bars to “no signal”, even when the phone is just sitting on the counter. I’m actually kind of disappointed I couldn’t fall in love with the Droid enough to switch. I’ve been a vocal complainer about AT&T lately and I wanted to put my $$ where my mouth is. Sadly, I feel like I’m giving up too much of the power and functionality I’ve come to rely on.

Thanks to Engadget for the images!

iphone, tech bits , , , ,

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. November 28th, 2009 at 11:57 | #1

    Thanks for the great post. I think I know how you feel vis-a-vis the “I’m a mac” viewpoint. If we were to generalize, I think that those who identify most with PC/Blackberry world would probably never go over to the dark side (ie, Mac/iphone) just like we Mac folks would never want to give up the great UX and simplicity offered by the Mac/iPhone universe.

    So what we have is two camps of die hards, really, and now the new contenders in this race are trying to appeal to the undecided middle. Not sure what value exists in the kind of persistent hype marketing we’ve seen lately from Droid (and to be fair, many of the other phone makers, including Apple) — at the end of the day, it’s about the total experience.

    Your OS may be great, but you’d better have some nice hardware with great UX, and oh yeah, some apps would be nice too–but if your carrier sucks, you’re still going to have frustrations. So far, none of the offerings lives up to the hype, but for me (and this is where brand provides the edge) I’ll stick with iPhone.

  2. November 28th, 2009 at 18:12 | #2

    This is my second attempt at a comment, so with any luck, this means that my thoughts will be twice as good because of the edit. We'll never know, alas. :)

    This whole discussion is really about user experience and brand. As a long-time former Windows and Blackberry user, and now fervent Mac/iPhone person, I would rather sell myself to slavery to the forces of evil then to go back to the windows nightmare of a user experience. Period, full stop, there's no way to induce me or get me off that point.

    Similarly, my windows/blackberry friends chide me for being a Mac/iPhone guy, saying that I pretty much own toys instead of real devices. As the author of 3 books on Mac stuff (including one on Mac OS X Unix) I find their ignorance quite amusing. But that, again, is the power of branding–they are convinced of their own superiority.

    That's cool, I get it. But in the middle are the vast undecided masses, the ones who aren't swayed one way or the other. They aren't UX pros, nor do they care about number of apps, or whatever. They want to text, make calls, maybe play some games, get on that "Twitter thing" and share photos via Facebook.

    The Android folks are trying to move into that headspace, but alas for them, Google is learning the bitter lesson that Apple learned when they tried to partner with Motorola — no matter how good your OS is, you need to take total dictatorial control of the entire product if you want half a chance of actually making something that doesn't suck.

    So Android's marketing is hype, but the reality is much more complex than that — you gotta have a great OS, great manufacturing, great rollout, great apps, and great connectivity/network. So far, none of the smartphones is great in all those things…..so the diehards retreat to what's comfortable (thank you branding) and the great undecided middle is left to decode all these conflicting messages.

    Is it good/bad/indifferent? I dunno. What I do know is that mobile is gonna dominate for a long time, and the person who figures out the whole thing is going to make an absurd killing.

  3. November 28th, 2009 at 19:05 | #3

    Great comments! I think you've highlighted a key point about how much branding plays a factor, and also the risk/reward of owning the whole stack. It worked against Apple for along time, until it didn't.

  4. November 30th, 2009 at 17:02 | #4

    In and around Boulder everyone's house seems to be in a "cell-phone vortex". Had the same problem with Verizon coverage. ATT's recently upgraded network appears to be helping, although a few dropped calls comes no where close to justifying a switch back to the smart phone dark ages.

  5. November 30th, 2009 at 18:17 | #5

    In general I agree with everything said with a few exceptions, which I will get to. On the whole, Ari nailed it, "The Droid *Almost* Does …"

    I switched from Verizon to T-Mobile three years ago because I needed more bang for my buck and I could get a heap of minutes and unlimited text and data for less than Verizon was charging for 400 minutes and nothing else. After some time with a BlackBerry Pearl (which is a great phone for what it is) I switched to an iPhone while keeping the same plan. My interest in the Droid had more to do with my desire to be on Verizon than any failings of the iPhone (though I have had several call-related issues that I can’t determine whether they are T-Mobile or the iPhone, and since I am on an “un-supported phone,” TMO won’t help).

    I have been an Apple devotee since the first Mac shipped in ‘84 (we couldn’t afford a Lisa), but I am far from a fanboy. As much as I like the iPhone, it has a lot of shortcomings that I hoped the Droid would address. One of my primary interests in the Droid was full integration with Google mail, calendar and apps. Imagine my complete shock when I found out that the seamless integration I have between my iPhone and Google is not possible on the Droid. The Gmail app is clunky at best and I can’t receive e-mail into my main box, but send with different addresses. Are you kidding me? Granted it took until OS 3.0 on the iPhone, but it works perfectly now.

    While I am more than happy to beta test software I rely on for a company I believe in, there is no way that I am paying $200 + $80/month to beta test the Droid for two years. Anyone thinking this isn’t a beta product hasn’t actually used it yet — it is half-backed and very unfinished.

    Without going on a diatribe, here is my short pro/con list:

    Pro:
    - Verizon coverage and call quality. I had no idea how much I missed this.
    - The Droid is simply the best GPS device I have used and most of the GPS apps are free and very high quality. Garmin should take note.
    - Google Contacts integration is exceptional.
    - User-upgradeable storage – buy a new SD card, not a new phone.
    - Much more open development platform for apps.
    - Extremely customizable … sort of.
    - Awesome screen resolution.
    - Physical keyboard means you can type and still have the entire screen available.

    Con:
    - Unnecessarily complex and very unintuitive.
    - Unusable in bright sunlight.
    - General interface is an abomination.
    - Screen colors are way off
    - Everything works intermittently
    - Good news: it has a physical keyboard. Bad news: it is the worst keyboard I have ever seen on a phone.
    - Good news: it include an amazing GPS. Bad news: GPS can drain the battery from 80% to 10% in just under an hour.
    - Apps are hit and miss, but most work intermittently and seem unfinished.
    - Did I say that the UI and UX are an abomination?

    I could go on, but I think Ari already hit the main points. The phone is close enough to an iPhone that I hope it will push Apple to improve the iPhone, but I struggle to see the Droid as being anything more than a very solid proof of concept. The Droid addressed nearly every shortcoming of the iPhone, but left out all the things that make the iPhone great.

    What’s next for me? Right now I am about 10-days into my 30-day trial and trying really hard to hold out for the full period hoping that something will turn me into a true Droid convert. I may send the Droid back because part of me thinks it could be defective since sometimes things work and sometimes they don’t, particularly the touch screen. Benefit of the doubt, right?

  6. November 30th, 2009 at 17:54 | #6

    I had a pretty frustrating experience with AT&T's recent 850 overlay in Boulder. Right after they did it, my coverage got much better at home, but its since degraded again. Real bummer.

  7. January 19th, 2010 at 05:56 | #7

    Thank you for the review. You are correct in that the AT&T network pretty much stinks. We are hoping that the iPhone will open up for other networks soon. I keep hearing that the Android is really great

  1. No trackbacks yet.